1.10.07

פֿאַרמישט

I had a slight breakdown prior to Rosh Hashanah this year. I found that i really dont know shit about my religion, and this was quite frustrating. During this period i considered two things: cast off religion (to save myself from hypocrisy) and continue on a strict Yiddishist program, or associated myself with an orthodox sect and figure shit out. Then i did a lot of thinking, and reading. I read Torah, and found that there wasnt much at all about Rosh HaShanah in there. This made me frustrated when I realized that much of what I consider "Jewish" (religion) revolves around a group of rabbis that claim that there was an Oral Law handed down along side the Torah at Mount Sinai (Although some Jewish groups reject this notion, but they arent Ashkenazi). Many Jewish practices rely heavily on the existence of the Oral Law (which was subsequently written down and put in books like the Talmud). Fortunately or unfortunately for Jews, the Oral Law is subject to much interpretation (bring in the rabbis). This revelation of sorts brought to me a much more open view of the "lesser" schools of Judaism (Reform in particular). So much of being a religious Jew is left up to interpretation that its almost impossible to point to the law and say "this is final".

I had an interesting conversation with my rabbi-in-training from back home during this ordeal of mine. He related to me a story about his family. He told me thus: his mother's side of the family was Talmudists, his father's side Yiddishists. He said how his father's side all married out of the faith (thus the nation by extension), and left behind even their Yiddishism. By contrast his mother's side remained Jewish. He basically told me, that even if i dont like it, Yiddishism was not a strong enough phenomenon to hold a people together, whereas the faith functioned as a backbone to the Jewish identity (religious or otherwise).

This put me at quite a loss. He appeared to be right; when chilling in a Jewish neighborhood today one doesnt hear Yiddish spoken, all the Yiddishists ended up marrying out, being killed in the Holocaust, becoming Zionists, or just dying in general... without enough of a legacy to keep it going.

It appeared to me that the next step for myself was to absorb a religious unit into my secular Yiddishist beleifs. The boost of religion would serve a preservative function to Yiddishism, keeping it fresh and edible from generation to generation.

I got through Rosh HaShanah okay, celebrating the new year in a Reform (my unlces) synagogue for the first time, then spending the second day in the Conservative synagogue by my college.

The next Saturday was Yom Kippur, and following my recent trend of not blindly doing religious stuff anymore, i read some more Talmud. I resolved not to wear shoes (as is instructed in the Talmud), and i followed all the other laws as set forth in the Talmud. It went pretty well.

Then the next day came...

Part of my daily routine involves shaving in the morning. Shaving smooth/with a razor is prohibited rather clearly in the Torah. Absolved of all my sins, I was faced with a dilemma, my first unnecessary violation of the Law. While i do plan on growing a beard eventually, i wasnt planing on starting now. I shaved, but i felt guilty. Then Shabbos came that next Friday night. I wasnt planning on attending services, but then i received a text message from a friend who, along with two others, needed a ride to synagogue. I had no reason to not drive them, so i did, but i didnt go to synagogue, and once again, i felt crappy. i felt crappy that Saturday too. However, observing the sabbath is a big deal, that, while possible, would be a huge commitment. On top of that there are 3 books of Talmud on the laws regarding the Sabbath, and i wasnt going to start doing something if i couldnt do it right...But i felt guilty none-the-less. Such guilt stemmed from feeling like a i wasnt being the best Jew i could be. Im not yet fluent in Yiddish and i dont know that much about my religion...

After a conversation with my sister, she helped me see that i was putting a lot of pressure on myself. She appluaded my ability to be constantly learning and searching, but she said i shouldnt make myself crazy. Thinking about this now, it really fits into my permenant r/evolution ideal of never settling. Never settling gets you respect i suppose, but it sure is emotionally exhausting, especially when its your identity that your not settling upon.

So what now...I'm not 100% sure, all i know is that im going to keep learning Yiddish, keep finding out stuff about my religion and culture, keep kosher, and keep growing my sidelocks (for freshness' sake)...

"דאָס לעבן פֿון אַ מענטש איז װי אַ טױטן טאַנץ"
(The life of a man is like a dance of the dead)

6 comments:

Jasper Yate said...

If not settling means bringing judaism to a different place than where it is, if you were to have that kind of clout, would you take it with you? Is your faithfulness to Judaism out of respect for tradition or what it did for human progress; if you are in it for the tradition can you help but settle for what that tradition implies (how can't you, organized religion dictates concrete ways of life as far as I've ever experienced it), or are you involved because it is a tool with which your ancesstors and yourself use to augment the process of progress in all facets of humanity?

Jasper Yate said...

nice logo by the way...haha you had no chance of gettin all that grey away it wouldve takin days it looks cool now anyway

The W said...

I find that my faithfulness to Judaism has a lot to do with that fact that i was born a Jew. I cant simply brush that of, it means something. However, what it means is the issue of much grief(?).
Yes Judaism dictates concrete ways of life, but it gets complicated. Much of the stuff in the Torah, as far as everyday life goes became null after the destruction of the Second Temple, sacrifices and whatnot (for reasons i have yet to understand). A lot of stuff in the Torah and other texts are up to interpretation. Non of those texts (i assume) imagined Jews living in the Diaspora in non-Jewish communities, which adds another shade of complexity.

In America there are a couple of major movements within Ashkenazi Judaism: reconstructionist, reform, conservative, modern orthodox, and the various ultra-orthodox groups (of who the members of may or may not consider me a Jew). All these groups interpret the texts the way they want to. However, not without being immune from hypocrisy (ex. the conservative movement says you can drive to synagogue on shabbos, yet you are lighting a flame and utilizing multiple electronic systems.)

I would say i wish sorting all this out was clear cut and easy, but then life wouldnt be that interesting...

This whole confusion stems really from me trying to figure out what a Jew is and what being Jewish means, and finding that there is no one answer. Despite this, i still find the need to figure out what the answer is for me personally; there should be at least that answer out there. The fact that my people was born from religion and its national identity is disintegrating makes my search for an answer frustrating.

Jasper Yate said...

I feel compelled to ask or mention that if you were born into a racist family in the south you'd have the same reason to be faithful to hating people based on stupid shit like race or religion, that is if such a large part of your faithfulness in your religion is based on heritage alone. It may be said that Judaism isn't as blatantly stupid as racism and the analogy doesn't follow, but the effect is irrelevant if heritage alone is the motive, if not the influence and utility of the practices become the focus of your faithfulness.

Your search for an answer reminds me of Kant and his religious sect called the Pieds. I don't know all to much about this, but they were a spin off from Lutherins (however you spell that). The point is that, if you ever read and get some good teaching on Kant this will probably mean a lot more, they, since they were idealists, obviously preached personal interpretation of holy texts, and I'm sure from what I know of Kant that they were a pretty do whatever the hell you want sect. Kant has, as far as I concern myself with religion at the moment, the answer for you, though far be it from me to explain to you what it is; a complete education on what that man thought would take 10 lifetimes for a regular person to understand, but the short version is that it is what you make it and you should make it whatever it says to you and you cannot humanly be wrong.

This obviously brings up the conflict of blind faith again, if you aren't in it for the actual traditions and culture that attracted you to it so much because they all have something wrong with them what are you in it for? Is it sentimentality and faithfulness to heritage in the sense that the religion existing is responsible somewhat for your being alive? Is it intellectual fondness for the Jewish doctrine - it would seem not if the sects are so differing? Or as I said before, which seems the only logical justification, although I don't agree with it; appreciation for the tool of change and progress that is Judaism?

...im gonna be going through some good shit for a while on my blog the first thing is up now check it out...

The W said...

youre right, that southern racist arguement is weak...

"if heritage alone is the motive"
My being born to my people is the basis of my motives. However it is not the end all be all. Birth was the begining of my existance, thus myidentity. However, from there I made a lot of realizations on my own after becoming concious of the fact that i am a Jew.

What makes this more interesting is the dual nature of Jewishness. On one hand it is a religion, on the other a smattering of nations. Customs reguarding life are dictated by these secular aspects, as well as customs of religion. I.E. the foods a nation within Judaism will permit on Passover, hairstyle, and so on.

I hold that one can never stop being Jewish, the sheer notion of such a beleif is absurd to me (and plenty others). You can convert, become atheist, or whatever, but you will always be a Jew. By denying your identity the most you can achieve is that generations down the line your descendants wont be Jews (nationally or religiously), but be void.

I wish i could be more focused...

I've often been told regaurding religion, it is what you make of it. Under that standardive been functioning a Jew (religiously) for all my life. However, i am developing a allegery to hypocrisy which puts a strain on that line of thinking. I dont want to be a zealot, but i dont want to be a blind hypocrite either. In order to get myself out of this bind it appears that i must study my people and religion as much as i can, and only then decide what it is i want to make of it. Making an uneducated decision to continue practicing my religion the way i currently do would be one of the worst things i could do. If i dont fully understand something, that is a poor reason to forget about it and move on to simpler pursuits. If after my studies i decide to continue to practice the way i have been for the last 18 years, then so be it; but at least i will be in a better position than those who line up like sheep to attend Yom Kippur services every year.
Hey, theres a rather good chance that there will be some rather fancy things in the piles of Jewish religious texts that could prove to be a nice addition to general human culture.

"if you aren't in it for the actual traditions and culture that attracted you to it so much because they all have something wrong with them what are you in it for?"
its not that they have things wrong with them, its just that there is no absolute right. i am in it for the tradition and culture; its just a pain because i dont know what THE tradition is and THE culture is. It would seem i have to learn them all and then sort out the one that i like...

I had a conversation with my sister after i watch a Yiddish film called the Dybbuk. The film, which is extremely bizarre, has a lot of things regaruding Jewish flok customs, mostly revolving around marriage. One thing that frustrates me is that i seem to know American culture much better than MY culture (more on that soon). The fact that i have to inquire constantly about Jewish customs, and was not raised to know them upset me. Im sure im not the only one, soon enough Jews in America are going to go through the motions at events like weddings without knowing what they hell all the customs and percularalities are.

Could you expand on the "appreciation for the tool of change and progress that is Judaism"?

Jasper Yate said...

Yea, alright my argument is pretty much based on that...

The only defensible - and I mean defensible, not acceptable (to me, of course) - way that I can see for dedicating such an immense amount of time to the study of the past, be it culture or what have you. By this I mean:

First of all, by remaining faithful to the traditions of your religion and culture, you are dedicating time to the study and appreciation of the past, I think this is agreeable. If you give me that, then we can move to the options of what it is that you are choosing to appreciate from your past. There is the part of that you are alive that you somewhat owe to Judaism in that it very indirectly influences infinite factors and resulted in you being born as a Jew; to that I hold that you could be born to any tradition and be proud for the same reason, such as a racist family, because all this suggests is that you are proud that it played a part in the reason you're alive and thus you choose to believe in that particular thing. That one sums up a lot of other sub reasons, which are all intellectually unacceptable by the same token. Therefore, the reason that I see as most intelligent with which to defend such allegiance to one's natural born religion is righteous pride, by which I mean: appreciation and respect (and thus pride) for the part Judaism played in the history of intelligent society, i.e., the tool Judaism served as for humanity and intelligent growth. I know much more about christianity so I'll use that as my example; christianity served as a tool for us to build certain level of stability of society etcetc, and brought about monotheism as a porminent form of reigion, as well as producing nearly all of the most brilliant minds ever to think on our planet. In this sense christianity was a tool for humanity, it was a stepping stone with which we could use to reach the age of science we are in. It's my personal opinion that now religion, though it at least deserves to be noted and appreciated for this aspect I meantion of it, is now archaic and only does harm to the intellectual age of mankind. It's served it's purpose for intelligent society, and now the organized and dogmatic aspect of it need to be done away with.

Yea I don't feel like writing any more if I'm not hittin the right nails....